![prime diagnostic imaging prime diagnostic imaging](https://www.timberlandmedical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG-20170617-WA0012-e1515140106120-488x315.jpg)
A proposal such as this needs the approval of the regulator, the Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Authority ( ARPANSA), which will assess the proposal to determine whether it ensures the safety of people and the natural environment.ĪRPANSA took the previous proposal by the Howard government very seriously. This will be difficult, as Premier Steven Marshall runs a minority government and, with an MP defecting in October, he’s likely to struggle to get the support he needs.įormer Prime Minister John Howard looks into the Opal Nuclear reactor in 2007 during a tour of the site at the Australia Nuclear Science and Technology Organistion at Lucas Heights, Sydney. This means the new proposal will require the current SA government to repeal or amend the current law. When the Howard government proposed storing radioactive waste in the state soon after, the subsequent Rann government strengthened that legislation. Twenty years ago, The Olsen government of SA passed legislation to prevent radioactive waste being brought into the state. While Pitt is celebrating what he regards as a resolution, there are three reasons this announcement is premature. But Australia has nuclear waste problems, tooĬurrently, radioactive waste – which results from the radiation needed to perform diagnostic imaging and cancer treatment – is scattered in dedicated storage facilities in hospitals across the country, but the majority is secured safely at Lucas Heights in Sydney. Japan plans to dump a million tonnes of radioactive water into the Pacific. Even waste with low potency levels needs to be stored away for centuries, so the community should be assured the repository is well designed and properly managed. It emits radiation, which can pollute water, kill wildlife and cause a number of deadly human health issues such as cancer. Radioactive waste is extremely hazardous to people and the environment. There is a good reason it has taken so long: storing radioactive waste is a complex issue. The announcement comes after six years of consultation with the local community – but, as federal Resources Minister Keith Pitt noted, the problem of managing radioactive waste has been on the national agenda for 40 years. The site, Napandee, comprises 211 hectares of government-acquired land, with radioactive waste set to be stored for over 100 years in deep trenches.
![prime diagnostic imaging prime diagnostic imaging](https://www.findhealthclinics.com/img/findhealthclinics/logo.png)
![prime diagnostic imaging prime diagnostic imaging](https://content3.jdmagicbox.com/comp/delhi/v2/011pxx11.xx11.100325111045.c3v2/catalogue/prime-diagnostic-imaging-centres-mayur-vihar-phase-3-delhi-pathology-labs-6vuidr-250.jpg)
Radioactive waste from nuclear medicine facilities around Australia will be trucked to and buried near the South Australian town of Kimba, the federal government announced this week.